|
Post by DungeonDevil on Feb 22, 2012 13:58:07 GMT -6
Reprinting the modules would be great, but unlikely. Pocket-book versions of the OOP stuff would be handier, IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by vladtolenkov on Feb 27, 2012 13:06:34 GMT -6
DungeonDevil wrote:
I think reprinting the modules would be a great move on their part.
It might seem unlikely, but who would have guessed they'd be reprinting the 1E corebooks in 2012 ?
|
|
|
Post by strangebrew on Feb 28, 2012 18:12:11 GMT -6
I don't think we'll be seeing original module reprints. I think what we MIGHT see is classic modules reinterpreted for the 5e rules, probably with new layout and some design changes. Which would still be pretty cool in my book.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Darke on Feb 29, 2012 11:44:40 GMT -6
From what I have been hearing about 5e I would have to agree. From all reports it looks like an edition I will like.
|
|
|
Post by vladtolenkov on Feb 29, 2012 12:45:13 GMT -6
I suppose its probably wishful thinking on my part, but what Mearls actually says in the quote from the OP isn't just about 5E. I'm much more interested in the fact that they may reprint earlier material (even if it is just for the game store market).
Although. . .if 5E is really the tookit edition as they've been saying--reprinting stuff becomes much more understandable especially if that material is useable with the new edition. And I mean useable as is--not a 5E "conversion" or whatever.
|
|