|
Post by calithena on Jan 6, 2009 16:14:26 GMT -6
I took this over on quizfarm; it's based on Robin Laws' categorization of playstyles. Turns out I'm a drama queen, though I had to answer a tiebreak question to get the answer:
Here's my breakdown: Method Actor 67% Storyteller 67% Butt-Kicker 50% Tactician 50% Specialist 42% Casual Gamer 8% Power Gamer 8%
I actually don't know what a Specialist is.
Is this useful at all?
|
|
|
Post by makofan on Jan 7, 2009 8:04:33 GMT -6
FWIW
You Scored as Character Player
The Character Player enjoys creating in-depth characters with distinct and rich personalities. He identifies closely with his characters, feeling detached from the game if he doesn’t. He takes creative pride in exploring different characters, often making each new one radically different than others he’s played. The Character Player bases his decisions on his character's psychology first and foremost. He may view rules as a necessary evil at best, preferring sessions in which the dice never come out of their bags. For the Character Player, the greatest reward comes from experiencing the game from the emotional perspective of an interesting character.
Character Player 80% Tactician 60% Storyteller 50% Casual Gamer 50% Specialist 45% Weekend Warrior 40% Power Gamer 30%
|
|
|
Post by brumbar on Jan 7, 2009 11:33:28 GMT -6
You Scored as Comedy Gamer You like games to be funny. If you arn't able to tell jokes and have a laugh during the game, what is the point? You'll like: Red Dwarf, Toon, HOL and Paranoia
Comedy Gamer 75% Cyberpunk Gamer 60% Horror Gamer 55% Fantasy Gamer 40% Beer & Prezels Gamer 35%
|
|
|
Post by kesher on Jan 7, 2009 11:35:35 GMT -6
You Scored as Character Player The Character Player enjoys creating in-depth characters with distinct and rich personalities. He identifies closely with his characters, feeling detached from the game if he doesn’t. He takes creative pride in exploring different characters, often making each new one radically different than others he’s played. The Character Player bases his decisions on his character's psychology first and foremost. He may view rules as a necessary evil at best, preferring sessions in which the dice never come out of their bags. For the Character Player, the greatest reward comes from experiencing the game from the emotional perspective of an interesting character.
Character Player 80% Casual Gamer 65% Storyteller 60% Specialist 60% Weekend Warrior 50% Tactician 45% Power Gamer 20% While I wouldn't necessarily disagree with these results, I'm not sure how useful this is. It seems to be slanted towards a pretty particular idea of what gaming is, one which runs counter to most of what we talk about on this site.
For ex: One statement reads something like, "Diplomacy and Knowledge skills are just as important as combat skills." I actually smiled and thought, now if you had worded that "Diplomacy and Inquisitiveness are just as important as combat", I'd have answered differently...
Am I making sense? I can't tell.
|
|
|
Post by dwayanu on Jan 7, 2009 11:55:13 GMT -6
Many (most?) of the statements to assess seemed pretty opaque to me. If I don't know what I'm "indicating," I doubt that the program does. Judging from Brumbar's and Kesher's posts, I got a different set of "questions." My result was:
83%, followed by Method Actor at 67% (tied, IIRC, with Character Player); I forget the rest.
I think that's in broad strokes a fair assessment. I expect that the weighting was strongly influenced by the fact that my single extreme response was affirmation of the importance of my choices in play as determinants of outcomes. Being so often unclear on just what was meant, I kept my other answers in the middle range (high or low based on my best guess).
So much depends on the definition of terms! The other day, a friend suggested (based on my saying that miniatures and a battle mat were not essential equipment) that OD&D was "more of a narrative game, then?" The context made his meaning clear, but it's not what I normally associate with the term (narrative as "story telling" in the sense associated, e.g., with the Dragonlance and Ravenloft modules).
It's hard to assess the weightings without definitions of the types. The designer throughout seems to assume that usages have objective referents ... and (without some prior instruction) that's just not so!
|
|
|
Post by dwayanu on Jan 7, 2009 12:16:13 GMT -6
The example Kesher gave begs the question of what "skills" mean in this context. Is the subject actual player skill, or the "stats" of characters?
I think interpretations in many cases would be different if informed by the 1st edition AD&D books than if informed by 3rd or 4rth edition.
One might get a more practically useful quiz by simply having players rate the "types" directly! This trick of pretending to "reveal a type" when the process is really just one of obscuring assumptions (in a quiz) or equating wordiness with profundity (in an article) is a stock in trade of "women's" magazines.
|
|
|
Post by calithena on Jan 7, 2009 12:44:39 GMT -6
Discussing playstyles is the tower of babel. I was talking to Ron Edwards about this the other day. He's realized that whereas when he talks about 'traditional gaming' he has in mind 80's to early 90's gaming, from the crunchy GURPS/HERO system wonk end to the railroady 2e/Vampire 'storytelling' end. He criticizes that stuff pretty strongly in many ways, but he actually has a good deal of fondness for the OLDER traditions we talk about here. So what's traditional gaming? Old-school dungeon-crawling? Old-school freeform sandbox? Old-school experimental gaming? Post-Runequest simulationism? 2e/White Wolf storytelling games? It's kind of a hopeless question.
Similarly with a term like 'narrative'. I associate this kind of gaming with old-school story-driven rules-light play and with some 2000's games coming out of the Forge and elsewhere. Fixed story arcs like you get in the Dragonlance/Vampire style leave me cold and I have no interest in them, because I want the players to be substantial creators of the story. But it would be totally reasonable given the big events in our hobby to associate 'narrative' or 'story gaming' with the era of the Rail Barons.
I don't spend much time talking theory on the internet any more - the nice thing about doing Fight On! is that I can show it rather than try to say it now, along with like-minded folks who contribute. But our language is a total disaster, and there's less prospect of fixing it at this point than ever.
The good news is that if we talk to people as individuals and play our games the way we like to we can gradually learn what we need anyway.
|
|
|
Post by brumbar on Jan 7, 2009 13:17:18 GMT -6
What was the exact name of the quizz? based on the examples given it seems I took a different test.
|
|
|
Post by dwayanu on Jan 7, 2009 13:19:18 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by makofan on Jan 7, 2009 13:45:48 GMT -6
Ah, I took the wrong quiz. Here is the result of the quiz posted by Dwayanu
You Scored as Butt-Kicker
You like a streightforward combat character. After a long day at the office, you want to clobber foes and once more prove your superiority over all who would challenge you.
Butt-Kicker 100% Tactician 100% Power Gamer 100% Storyteller 33% Specialist 33% Casual Gamer 25% Method Actor 0%
|
|
|
Post by brumbar on Jan 7, 2009 15:34:34 GMT -6
What sort of Gamer are you? WAS THE ONE I TOOK.
|
|
|
Post by dwayanu on Jan 7, 2009 15:36:45 GMT -6
Those look like strikingly different assessments! Which is closer to the real Makofan?
|
|
|
Post by snorri on Jan 7, 2009 15:43:22 GMT -6
Storyteller 75% Tactician 67% Method Actor 67% Specialist 58% Casual Gamer 33% Butt-Kicker 25% Power Gamer 17%
I guess it's true
|
|
premmy
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
Posts: 295
|
Post by premmy on Jan 7, 2009 15:49:09 GMT -6
Using dwayanu's link, I got:
Tactician - 75% Storyteller - 58% Power Gamer - 42% Butt-Kicker - 42% Casual Gamer - 25% Specialist - 25% Method Actor - 17%
I guess I can agree with that, by and large.
|
|
sham
Level 6 Magician
Posts: 385
|
Post by sham on Jan 7, 2009 18:28:57 GMT -6
Hmm
I think the results do depend on the context in which you read the questions. The author probably could have used more specific wording in some of the questions, but all in all it's not a bad quiz. Short and fairly accurate. I'd say that Butt-Kicker and Method Actor are in ther right order (first and last) but the others I am not convinced of. Then again, I read many of the questions as a referee, so I can see why Power Gamer scored a bit high.
You Scored as Butt-Kicker You like a streightforward combat character. After a long day at the office, you want to clobber foes and once more prove your superiority over all who would challenge you.
Butt-Kicker 100% Tactician 67% Power Gamer 67% Storyteller 33% Casual Gamer 17% Specialist 17% Method Actor 0%
|
|
|
Post by brumbar on Jan 7, 2009 19:09:12 GMT -6
My results with the proper test. You Scored as Power Gamer The Power Gamer wants to make his character bigger, tougher, buffer, and richer. However success is defined in your game, that's what you want. You want the "game" put back into "roleplaying game," and you want the chance to add shiny new abilities to your character sheet.
Power Gamer 83% Tactician 75% Butt-Kicker 67% Storyteller 58% Casual Gamer 50% Specialist 33% Method Actor 33%
|
|
|
Post by chgowiz on Jan 7, 2009 21:43:50 GMT -6
I was surprised at my results, I never saw myself this way...
You Scored as Tactician
You're probably a military buff who wants to have the chance to think through complex problems. You want the rules, and your GM's interpretation of them, to match up what happens in the real world or at least be consistant. You want challenging yet logical obstacles to overcome.
Tactician 83% Method Actor 67% Butt-Kicker 50% Specialist 50% Storyteller 42% Power Gamer 33% Casual Gamer 0%
|
|
|
Post by trollman on Jan 16, 2009 16:37:33 GMT -6
You Scored as Butt-Kicker
You like a streightforward combat character. After a long day at the office, you want to clobber foes and once more prove your superiority over all who would challenge you.
Butt-Kicker 100% Power Gamer 67% Specialist 50% Method Actor 25% Tactician 17% Casual Gamer 17% Storyteller 0%
|
|
|
Post by gsvenson on Jan 16, 2009 18:02:38 GMT -6
This gives me a new perspective on my gaming style. I should ask Dave Arneson if he agrees with the survey's assessment of my gaming style...
You Scored as Method Actor
You think that gaming is a form of creative expression. You may view rules as, at best, a necessary evil, preferring sessions where the dice never come out of the bag. You enjoy situations that test or deepen your character's personality traits.
Method Actor 92% Butt-Kicker 83% Storyteller 83% Tactician 58% Specialist 42% Power Gamer 42% Casual Gamer 25%
|
|
|
Post by Finarvyn on Jan 17, 2009 14:41:36 GMT -6
I used the quiz in the link earlier. Dunno where to find the other quiz.
You Scored as Tactician You're probably a military buff who wants to have the chance to think through complex problems. You want the rules, and your GM's interpretation of them, to match up what happens in the real world or at least be consistant. You want challenging yet logical obstacles to overcome.
Tactician 83% Butt-Kicker 67% Storyteller 67% Method Actor 67% Specialist 58% Power Gamer 50% Casual Gamer 25%
|
|
|
Post by katana on Feb 14, 2009 21:22:19 GMT -6
Interesting quiz...pretty well thought out, but I always figured into the character..
You Scored as Character Player
The Character Player enjoys creating in-depth characters with distinct and rich personalities. He identifies closely with his characters, feeling detached from the game if he doesn't. He takes creative pride in exploring different characters, often making each new one radically different than others have played. The Character Player bases his decisions on his character's psychology first and foremost. He may view rules as a necessary evil at best, preferring sessions in which the dice never come out of their bags. For the Character Player, the greatest reward comes from experiencing the game from the emotional perspective of an interesting character.
Character Player 85% Storyteller 60% Casual Gamer 60% Specialist 55% Tactician 55% Power Gamer 35% Weekend Warrior 20%
|
|