Dungeons & Dragons (1975-1979) > supplement threads?

[Malchor]

Question, or suggestion, for the Mods—per usual, something that must have come up before.

Why aren't there threads for each of the supplements in Dungeons & Dragons (1971-1979)?

Every time I want to ask a question about Greyhawk, or specific to another one, I look for it, remember there isn't one and post in OD&D General while feeling like that's not right either as the description for that forum is 1974 LBBs.

Should there be a forum for each? Was that tired and turned out to be a bad idea?

Should there be one forum for all supplements and supplemental works (e.g., Strategic Review and The Dragon)?

As I said, this is as much a question as a suggestion, as my guess is there is a reason it is the way it is.

[rredmond]

Better question for Finarvyn but I think one of the past Mods was uber organized, and tried to make the forums very user-friendly.
But Fin is a better answerer for this question, and any requests to change it

[Zenopus]

Each of the subforums has a description listed beneath the title, and the description for each of the subforums for OD&D Volumes I-III indicates that it also covers the corresponding material from the supplements and strategic Review. For example, the Men & Magic forum covers character class info from the original volume as well as any supplements or SR.

[Malchor]

Mar 21, 2023 7:30:19 GMT -6 Zenopus said:

Each of the subforums has a description listed beneath the title, and the description for each of the subforums for OD&D Volumes I-III indicates that it also covers the corresponding material from the supplements and strategic Review. For example, the Men & Magic forum covers character class info from the original volume as well as any supplements or SR.

Doh! I will admit that I missed that. Thanks.