|
Post by tdenmark on Nov 28, 2020 1:04:11 GMT -6
Dragon Magazine #60 had this great article about Elves and it tries to explain how ghoul's paralysis worked.
|
|
|
Post by countingwizard on Nov 30, 2020 13:06:18 GMT -6
It's worth noting that a Chainmail turn is perhaps more akin to an OD&D round. In any case, Ghoul paralysis is only relevant for that specific combat - the question is mainly if it takes someone out of the fight entirely or merely makes them skip a turn. Yep. You get it. And those extra rules wouldn't be able to apply because you wouldn't be able to move any figures during combat other than to engulf the enemy (highly unlikely due to post-melee morale check) or enjoin combat from a nearby unit.
|
|
|
Post by countingwizard on Nov 30, 2020 13:10:26 GMT -6
Dragon Magazine #60 had this great article about Elves and it tries to explain how ghoul's paralysis worked. Yeah. Just from observing how ghoul paralysis works out by the rules, I eventually came to that same conclusion too. It's also why you don't get a save vs paralysis (that's wands only). I also figure it's probably not as intense as magical paralysis, and so wouldn't require a survive adversity check. Like they aren't literally frozen in place, they are just made unable to act or defend themselves (indecisive) out of fear.
|
|
|
Post by scottyg on Nov 30, 2020 13:21:16 GMT -6
Dragon Magazine #60 had this great article about Elves and it tries to explain how ghoul's paralysis worked. I like the explanation given in the Slayers Guide to Undead that Gygax published in the 3E era: ghouls transfer the rigor mortis that they have cheated to their victims, so I describe it as an extremely painful locking up experience as the paralysis spreads from the touch spot.
|
|
|
Post by tdenmark on Nov 30, 2020 16:07:04 GMT -6
Dragon Magazine #60 had this great article about Elves and it tries to explain how ghoul's paralysis worked. I like the explanation given in the Slayers Guide to Undead that Gygax published in the 3E era: ghouls transfer the rigor mortis that they have cheated to their victims, so I describe it as an extremely painful locking up experience as the paralysis spreads from the touch spot. Does a ghoul ever run out of rigor mortis to share?
|
|
|
Post by tdenmark on Nov 30, 2020 18:22:54 GMT -6
I like the explanation given in the Slayers Guide to Undead that Gygax published in the 3E era: ghouls transfer the rigor mortis that they have cheated to their victims, so I describe it as an extremely painful locking up experience as the paralysis spreads from the touch spot. Does a ghoul ever run out of rigor mortis to share? Sorry, but this really tickles my fancy. I just picture this ghoul handing out bundles of rigor mortis. Want some rigor mortis? Here! Oh, you want some too? Here! More rigor mortis for you! Not to say I don't like the interpretation, because I kinda do.
|
|
|
Post by linebeck on Dec 1, 2020 15:34:30 GMT -6
|
|