Original D&D Discussion
« D&D Next Playtest Material »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 26, 2013, 3:12am




Original D&D Discussion :: Other :: Other Editions and Simulacrum Games :: 3E / 4E / 5E :: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Page 9 of 10 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: D&D Next Playtest Material (Read 3,570 times)
funkaoshi
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline




[homepage]

Joined: Jun 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 88
Location: Torotno
Karma: 16
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #120 on Aug 1, 2012, 2:02pm »

Agreed. It felt like what you'd get if you tried to take the early rules and make them work with D20 mechanics. I'm hoping they continue to keep things simple. That seems to be the goal based on the stuff on their blog and the few interviews I've seen with Mearls.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Azafuse
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 150
Karma: 5
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #121 on Aug 13, 2012, 9:38pm »

The New Playtest Package is out!

Finally we have Creation Rules, which clearly push towards the first editions' humanocentrism.

And the Fighter looks way better than in its previous release.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
hogscape
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline



Invisibility 10 ft. Radius



Joined: Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 324
Karma: 13
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #122 on Aug 14, 2012, 5:52am »

Yeah, the new play test material is very encouraging.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Koren n'Rhys
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline

[avatar]

Got your mirrorshades?


[homepage]

Joined: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 223
Location: Norwich, NY, USA
Karma: 7
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #123 on Aug 14, 2012, 8:46am »

Grabbed my copy last night - with NO download/connection issues at all! Just starting to read through, but looks encouraging enough so far.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

I've got a project. Or two. Gamer ADD, you know?
trebormills
Level 2 Seer
*
member is offline





Joined: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: wales
Karma: 2
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #124 on Aug 14, 2012, 10:31am »

Just downloading latest stuff to have a look at
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
thegreyelf
Level 9 Sorcerer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Elf Lair Games: The New Class of Old School!



Joined: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,307
Karma: 43
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #125 on Aug 14, 2012, 2:31pm »

I am loving everything about the new D&D rules. I haven't been this excited about D&D since...well, okay, since they announced they were reprinting first edition. But I haven't been this excited about a NEW EDITION since they first announced 3.0 back in 99 or 00.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Jason Vey, The Grey Elf
President, Elf Lair Games
http://www.elflair.com/
D&D Resources: http://www.grey-elf.com
Julian Grimm
Level 6 Magician
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Apr 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 399
Location: Niangua, Missouri
Karma: 16
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #126 on Aug 14, 2012, 5:23pm »

I'm generally impressed. If WOTC continues this trend I can see the new edition on my shelf. Looking it over I found a few things I am going to borrow for my BFRPG/RC game.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Tartarus Press:My gaming blog.

Donner Party Meats: We're here to serve you!
cooper
Level 7 Enchanter
****
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 561
Karma: 17
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #127 on Aug 14, 2012, 6:25pm »

I don't understand what a "laser cleric" is. I don't think WotC does either. It's a subclass that is really nothing like it's parent. I guess the analogy is:

battle cleric is to laser cleric, as wizard is to battle mage. I.E. both classes have a sliding scale on how "magical" and how "martial" the class could concievably be, but for whatever reason (going back to specialty priests in 2e) all clerics outside of the generic tend to be a overpowered and have too many special abilities.

Mearls and team is obviously struggling with this. The original clerics spells were really out of combat abilities, but the 5e battle cleric is more spell caster than fighter....but so is the laser cleric! a hot mess. The cleric is the most "video gamey" character so far. A far cry from the warrior who gave up swords and some combat prowress for the ability to turn undead and create some food and water.

5e so far has a battle mage and two wizard classes, but no cleric.
« Last Edit: Aug 14, 2012, 6:31pm by cooper »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Azafuse
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 150
Karma: 5
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #128 on Aug 15, 2012, 1:40pm »

Doug from Blue Boxer Rebellion pointed out some kind of gygaxian prose in the Playtest Documents. :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
tombowings
Level 7 Enchanter
****
member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: Nov 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 517
Location: Corvallis, OR
Karma: 13
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #129 on Aug 15, 2012, 7:09pm »

I'm not seeing anything that really impresses me here. I'm just not seeing how some can play a AD&D-type fighter while some else plays a 4th edition-style one - same with the other classes as well.

Am I just missing something?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Check out Magician's Manse, my old school Dungeons and Dragons blog.
Cameron DuBeers
Level 9 Sorcerer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Did I Make My Save?



Joined: Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,555
Location: Austin TX USA
Karma: 152
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #130 on Aug 15, 2012, 7:59pm »

No, I don't believe you are missing anything. WotC softened the "play any edition" line before the larger play-tests began.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

waysoftheearth
Moderator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

[ImmersiveInk]



Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,221
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Karma: 195
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #131 on Aug 21, 2012, 11:15pm »

I've had a skim over some of the new play test material too... at a superficial level it still appears to me much like a merger of D&D's Basic and 4E incarnations.

One thing that struck me as a neat idea is the "side effects" that a warlock suffers for memorising spells -- that's potentially a cool idea for all magic-users :)

I'm sure they will wind up with a fine game, but it doesn't appear to me that 5E will recapture the "spirit" of earlier editions of D&D.

Why not? Because long lists of "capabilities" and "options" that are added to PCs puts the focus on the "PC Build" sub-game. It means players have to be across all the possible options before they can make an informed choice about any option. That's great for selling lots of books full of options, but the poor referee has to be across all the possible options for all the possible player classes and for all the monsters too! All that reading is ultimately a barrier to entry for new players.

Why, for example, do we need two and half pages of text to tell us what a dwarf is? OD&D has... what, just one paragraph?

The "PC Build" sub-game is a fundamentally different thing to the "exploration/problem solving" game of the earliest editions. Sure, they can both work and be good fun in their own way, but they do push different buttons.

I had hoped WotC would strip the 5E core rules right back to an absolutely minimal game, and put all the extra "stuff" into optional supplementary material. But I don't really see it happening that way...

« Last Edit: Aug 21, 2012, 11:17pm by waysoftheearth »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
trebormills
Level 2 Seer
*
member is offline





Joined: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: wales
Karma: 2
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #132 on Aug 22, 2012, 6:32pm »

having had a skim over the new docs Im not that impressed...i may need to re read but I found myself bored and thinking why go for this over an OSR or original pre 2nd edition version of the game?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Julian Grimm
Level 6 Magician
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Apr 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 399
Location: Niangua, Missouri
Karma: 16
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #133 on Aug 26, 2012, 4:41pm »

I'm not liking the rogue as presented. The scheme idea is awkward and I cannot find any reference to picking pockets. I can see myself just making a standard rogue and not using the options in the book. The rest of it is OK but is beginning to remind me of D&D Essentials. While not a bad thing it was not what I was expecting to see. Overall I am still happy with what I am seeing I am just wondering why they chose to include what they did.

As an aside, I see some things that will be used in my C&C game, mainly how ability checks work and backgrounds should be easily adaptable.
« Last Edit: Aug 26, 2012, 4:41pm by Julian Grimm »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Tartarus Press:My gaming blog.

Donner Party Meats: We're here to serve you!
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,676
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: D&D Next Playtest Material
« Reply #134 on Aug 27, 2012, 5:34am »


Aug 15, 2012, 7:09pm, tombowings wrote:
I'm just not seeing how some can play a AD&D-type fighter while some else plays a 4th edition-style one - same with the other classes as well.

Am I just missing something?
I don't think it will happen this way at the same game table.

I've always interpreted this statement as the same core rules could be used to simulate more than one edition so that I mght run a 4E-style game while you might run an AD&D-style game by using different add-on rules.

It doesn't make sense the other way because the power scales are so clearly incompatible unless you could blend a 3rd level 4E MU with a 9th level AD&D fighter, for example. I suppose that someone could come up with a true power rating to allow some mix-and-match, or totally re-do the XP charts so that 10,000 XP might be equal for all editions even if it would mean new levels.

Just a thought.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
« Page 9 of 10 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile