Original D&D Discussion
« All quiet again on the WB front »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 20, 2013, 11:13am




Original D&D Discussion :: Other :: Other Editions and Simulacrum Games :: Swords & Wizardry :: All quiet again on the WB front
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: All quiet again on the WB front (Read 1,917 times)
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,673
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 All quiet again on the WB front
« Thread Started on Jan 18, 2011, 1:20pm »

I think we’ve reached an agreement for the WB. The other thread is now gone, as per Matt’s suggestion.


Jan 18, 2011, 6:49am, Finarvyn wrote:

Here's my offer. Matt can have total control over the WB licensing, etc, as long as three things happen:
1) He pays me $51. Fifty bucks to reimburse me for my cover art and $1 for my writing.
2) He keeps my name on as author or co-author.
3) He sends me a free complementary "Pete Mullen" cover copy of WB from Lulu. If it's not brand new, at least in decent condition.

That's it. My name stays out of the legal disclaimer stuff that I don't really understand anyway. I'm done with WB in every legal sense except that I still get to see my name in print.



Jan 18, 2011, 10:28am, mythmere wrote:
[quote author=admin board=retroclone thread=5185 post=63543 time=1295351340]I'm considerably calmed down now, too. And I agree with Fin about the money - that's not the issue. Here's what I can do:

1) We can remove my name as co-author. It certainly hurt me to have it removed unilaterally, but if it had been discussed ahead of time it probably wouldn't have been a killer like it was under these circumstances. Also, although I can't find it, I remember writing Marv an email about getting author status, not just contributor status. I don't recall it saying sole authorship, but for all I know it might have been unclear enough to create that impression.

2) I can send a copy of the Mullen WB book; it's my only copy, but since I play Core or Complete, I can let it go if Marv doesn't have a copy.

3) The $51 is fair enough. That's the mental way I would have restructured it, too. The nominal $1 for authorship suggests that I wouldn't place a value on what you wrote, which isn't true. On the other hand, I can't pay what it's actually worth in terms of what authors are paid outside the OSR. I can offer $50 for the author component, which is a low figure, but it's what I can afford right now, and since what we are doing here is less about the amounts and more about the message being sent, I would rather that the amount not reflect a purely nominal value on the work you did. I understand perfectly the psychological side involved here - that's what tripped me up, too - and there is considerable value to being able to tell friends and family that "I got paid for this, not much, but a real check for being an author." As a matter of pride (which I don't mean in a bad way - I mean in terms of standing up for oneself) you have to get a dollar figure for the writing, and you are offering to take one dollar. I think if one isn't writing for free, one should get a real check. The $1 figure you're offering, in the long run, will feel like a legal settlement rather than being rewarding. And while I was pissed off about all kinds of things yesterday, you getting due credit wasn't one of the things I had a problem with.

4) in terms of "legal disclosure," I'm not entirely certain what you mean, but if you mean the small print at the end, and it's an objective (and it is) to make sure you get credit as the author, you want to stay in there - if someone else uses the text of the game, their work would not credit you if you aren't mentioned there in the back. We can discuss how that all works outside the thread, it's not very interesting, but it is relevant to your objective. If you simply, absolutely don't want to tangle with it, that's fine, it's not a condition of mine, but I think you might want to just briefly understand the effect of that.

5) Since the crux of this problem was originally because we weren't specific about terms, I want to propose a couple of things to define: I will (and already have in almost all cases) delete my pissed off posts so they don't remain around for people to point to. This thread should be deleted, but keep your offer and this response public, so people can clearly see that there was no "back room" compromise. You, Coleston and I all agree that all legal issues about the authorship, copyright, and statements we made are all settled. Each of us agrees not to raise the issue again, other than to simply refer people to this thread where the agreement is made.

How about that?
Matt

I know you suggested that we discuss out of public, but I thought it would be a good idea to let everyone online know that we are amicable and (hopefully) that there are no long-term bad feelings.

Regarding #1 – I’m agreeable to author or co-author status. You decide what’s fair.

Regarding #2 -- As for the Mullen book, I don’t want to take your only copy. I managed to obtain one on my own, but just thought it would be nice to get a freebie for my efforts. Remove that one from my list.

Regarding #3 – I’m still fine with $1, but I really appreciate your offer to increase it. That way I can say I’m a professional game designer. (In college I did cartoons for $0.50 per day, so I’m a professional cartoonist as well.) There was never intent on my end to make money on the WB.

Regarding #4 – I think I have a decent understanding of what you’re saying. I propose that you get whatever legal language you need/want in order to keep control and I can’t come back later to whine about wanting anything back I’ve given away. I’d like my name to be associated with the WB as best as I can, but have no rights to negotiate contracts on behalf of WB. If that means “author credit” in the fine print, great. I don’t need “copyright credit” or whatever.

Regarding #5 – I’ve tried to clean up my mess as best as possible. If I find threads on it, I’ll try to post and let everyone know that all’s fine now. It was a misunderstanding. Everything is settled. Everyone is happy.

I really do appreciate the opportunity that I’ve had to work with you and S&W.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
mythmere
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 293
Karma: 21
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #1 on Jan 18, 2011, 1:30pm »

Sounds good - only note to the above is that I was also in favor of resolving it in public rather than off-line. So that worked out well. :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,673
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #2 on Jan 18, 2011, 1:36pm »

After the past couple of days, the smart thing for me to do would simply be to lay low and relax. On the other hand, I realized during some of the flurry of posts that I should thank a few people and that some of the thank-you statements I posted vanished when I cleaned up my mess.
  • I'd like to thank John at Brave Halfling. Rarely will you find a person more willing to work hard to "make it right" than John. I hope that Brave Halfling will consider supporting WB again and hope that gamers will support BH by buying their products.
  • I'd like to thank Jesse for his layout. Not only did he go through a lot of fuss with formats, but dealt with scads of last-minute typos and corrections for me. I don't think I ever really expressed how much I appreciate that hard work.
  • I'd like to thank Matt for his part in the whole process. Sure, we exchanged some nasty words, but I think we both regret this from the heart. Matt took a guy who had never written anything for publication and gave him (me) the chance to make my mark on the world of gaming. It's a dream come true for me, and Matt is the guy who did it for me.
Thanks to all three of you for making the WB work and making it look good!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,673
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #3 on Jan 18, 2011, 1:37pm »


Jan 18, 2011, 1:30pm, mythmere wrote:
Sounds good - only note to the above is that I was also in favor of resolving it in public rather than off-line. So that worked out well. :)
You are correct, sir. You mentioned that in your e-mail and I should have tweaked my post.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
vlark
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline




[homepage]

Joined: Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 119
Karma: 18
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #4 on Jan 18, 2011, 1:45pm »

Okay! Nice to see you boys shake hands and make nice.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Professor P
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: Nov 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 94
Location: A stale, dusty library
Karma: 1
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #5 on Jan 18, 2011, 2:14pm »

I'm happy to see that an agreement has been made. Kudos to both Matt and Marv for working it out in the most amicable way possible.

Also, kudos to John for supporting White Box and playing a role in the reconciliation. I, for one, will continue to support White Box if John and Brave Halfling Publishing continue to sell its products.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Rolling my Percent Chance to Know to parse Dungeons and Dragons.
Julian Grimm
Level 6 Magician
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Apr 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 398
Location: Niangua, Missouri
Karma: 16
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #6 on Jan 18, 2011, 3:26pm »

Glad to see this resolved.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Tartarus Press:My gaming blog.

Donner Party Meats: We're here to serve you!
Falconer
Level 9 Sorcerer
*****
Cleric of OD&D
member is offline

[avatar]

OD&D, Middle-earth, Star Trek TOS

[icq]
[homepage]

Joined: Sept 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,338
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 51
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #7 on Jan 18, 2011, 3:53pm »

One sale right here!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Michael Falconer - Old School Star Trek Role-playing
Do we walk in legends or on the green earth in the daylight?

A man may do both. For not we but those who come after will make the legends of our time. The green earth, say you? That is a mighty matter of legend, though you tread it under the light of day! —J.R.R. Tolkien
arcadayn
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline





Joined: Sept 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 225
Location: Des Moines, Iowa USA
Karma: 3
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #8 on Jan 18, 2011, 5:07pm »

Very glad to see a resolution! I also enjoy both of your contributions to the community and its forums. Long live all versions of S&W and Brave Halfling!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Craig J. Brain
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline

[avatar]

Herald of the Apocalypse



Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 90
Location: Australia
Karma: 1
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #9 on Jan 19, 2011, 8:09pm »

I've been reading a lot lately about the OSR, and the roots of the gaming hobby. The White Box and the recently released version of Dave Arneson's original game appeal to me greatly for some reason.

I am happy to see these kinds of games being produced that make us examine the basics of gaming.

I've just about finished reading Andre Norton's Quag Keep, the first book set in Gygax's Greyhawk and given that EGG had input into the book in many facets (as I understand it), I am surprised that D&D didn't evolve down a different model for races and classes for PCs.

Craig J. Brain
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

WardCo. Publishers of the world's 1st sci-fi RPG.
WardCo. Cafe Press Store
Metamorphosis Alpha 1e rules reprint.
New MA Adventure The House on the Hill.
jeffb
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Karma: 3
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #10 on Jan 27, 2011, 11:02am »

UHM-- I was without internet access for a couple of weeks- moving...and the storms here prevented a quicker hook-up.

What the heck happened while I was gone?

Will there be no WB support anymore? from anyone? As much as I love "complete" over core, WB is still my fave with it's "easily tinkered with" approach, and I see BHP has decided to offer it's own game now.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"GROWF??"

"Maybe I'm just getting too old to want to have to deal with a heap o' rules and the steaming heap o' rules lawyers who go with them."-Gary Gygax

"D&D was meant to be a free-wheeling game, only loosely bound by the parameters of the rules." Tim Kask, Foreword, Eldritch Wizardry 1976
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,673
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #11 on Jan 27, 2011, 11:35am »


Jan 27, 2011, 11:02am, jeffb wrote:
Will there be no WB support anymore? from anyone? As much as I love "complete" over core, WB is still my fave with it's "easily tinkered with" approach, and I see BHP has decided to offer it's own game now.
Brave Halfling is no longer supporting the WB, but has decided to devolop their own "house" system called Delving Deeper, which is designed as an old school rules line similar in philosophy to the WB. (This sounds quite exciting to me and I can't wait to see what they come up with!)

Matt Finch is planning a revised version of the WB to be released as soon as it's ready. I'm not sure which company will handle this, since I'm out of that part of the product line. The original WB is still a free download on the Mythmere Games site. I believe I read (heard?) that there would be a printed version on Lulu, but I can't recall where I got that info or if I just imagined it. ;)

There is a thread about a new WB-only fanzine being planned.

Bottom line is that there are plans afoot for continued support for the WB rules system. Brave Halfling just won't be spearheading the project the way they have for the past year or so.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
jeffb
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Karma: 3
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #12 on Jan 27, 2011, 12:08pm »



Thanks for the update, Marv :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"GROWF??"

"Maybe I'm just getting too old to want to have to deal with a heap o' rules and the steaming heap o' rules lawyers who go with them."-Gary Gygax

"D&D was meant to be a free-wheeling game, only loosely bound by the parameters of the rules." Tim Kask, Foreword, Eldritch Wizardry 1976
Koren n'Rhys
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline

[avatar]

Got your mirrorshades?


[homepage]

Joined: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 222
Location: Norwich, NY, USA
Karma: 7
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #13 on Jan 27, 2011, 12:30pm »

Jeff, there is a lot of info on Matt's plans for WB over at the S&W forums. Sounds like he's going to make some tweaks to get it to what he wants, then put up the free PDFs as well as hardcover on Lulu and beyond that let the fanbase have it's way with it.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

I've got a project. Or two. Gamer ADD, you know?
jeffb
Level 3 Conjurer
**
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Karma: 3
 Re: All quiet again on the WB front
« Reply #14 on Jan 27, 2011, 2:39pm »


Jan 27, 2011, 12:30pm, Koren n'Rhys wrote:
Jeff, there is a lot of info on Matt's plans for WB over at the S&W forums. Sounds like he's going to make some tweaks to get it to what he wants, then put up the free PDFs as well as hardcover on Lulu and beyond that let the fanbase have it's way with it.


Thank You- I actually did head over to those forums to see what was going on after I posted my initial comment.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"GROWF??"

"Maybe I'm just getting too old to want to have to deal with a heap o' rules and the steaming heap o' rules lawyers who go with them."-Gary Gygax

"D&D was meant to be a free-wheeling game, only loosely bound by the parameters of the rules." Tim Kask, Foreword, Eldritch Wizardry 1976
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile