Original D&D Discussion
« John Carter! »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 25, 2013, 1:55pm




Original D&D Discussion :: Other TSR Classics :: Warriors of Mars (1974) :: John Carter!
« Page 2 of 4 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: John Carter! (Read 1,873 times)
Falconer
Level 9 Sorcerer
*****
Cleric of OD&D
member is offline

[avatar]

OD&D, Middle-earth, Star Trek TOS

[icq]
[homepage]

Joined: Sept 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,341
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 51
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #15 on Jul 14, 2011, 10:38pm »


Jul 14, 2011, 4:50pm, Finarvyn wrote:
Maybe it's the way I've seen the old book covers, but the flying ships just looked creepy and not at all like I imagined them to be.

This is a ship of Barsoom!
[image]

What is this?
[image]

Kind of creepy. Just my two cents.

Maybe since creatures on Barsoom naturally have six limbs (green martians, white apes, thoats, etc), their ships were modeled after native six-winged birds (which have since died out?).
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Michael Falconer - Old School Star Trek Role-playing
Do we walk in legends or on the green earth in the daylight?

A man may do both. For not we but those who come after will make the legends of our time. The green earth, say you? That is a mighty matter of legend, though you tread it under the light of day! —J.R.R. Tolkien
kesher
Level 10 Necromancer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Hobbyist of the Absurd & Recumbent Strategist


[homepage]

Joined: Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,330
Location: New Hope, MN
Karma: 93
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #16 on Jul 15, 2011, 8:38am »

Hah! I absolutely buy that!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"He was one hundred seventy days dying and not yet dead."

SANDBOX EMPIRE

scribbledehobble
DungeonDevil
Level 6 Magician
***
member is offline

[avatar]

Put Me In That Dungeon.



Joined: Sept 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 387
Karma: 5
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #17 on Jul 15, 2011, 2:48pm »


Jul 14, 2011, 1:48pm, kesher wrote:
Okay, my friend, don't just groan--explain the groan! I mean, "abomination" is a pretty strong word.

IMO, that trailer is anything BUT ersatz.

(I'm not trying to start a fight here, I just want to understand your objections...)


* The green martians looked little, if at all, the way I envisioned. Definitely not savage enough to instill dread.
* The actress playing Dejah Thoris doesn't look suitably exotic and alluring enough. Several years ago I mentioned that she should be latina, perhaps Brazilian. :) Plus, too much kit for my Jasoomian tastes. ;)
* The desert of the American SW does not = Barsoom.
* The airship does not even closely resemble the way it's described in the books.
* The lead actor (Kitsch?) is rather anaemic-looking for JC.
* The production company earned my contempt when they announced that they would not be employing the fabulous imagery created by Frank Frazetta, with the excuse that they found his art to be too 'outdated' or somesuch limp language. >:(
I'll stop there as the taste of bile in my throat is choking me.

EDIT: Also, the fact they changed the title from A Princess of Mars to John Carter shows Disney's/Hollywood's misogyny. The emphasis is shifted away from the object of his love and the very reason for the protagonist's epic struggles to return to her and rescue her from peril. Really APoM is a romance novel written from the man's perspective. It's about what we are willing to endure, what we are ready to sacrifice for the most beautiful woman on the planet. Can't get more romantic than that. With the name-change the Princess just becomes the peripheral love-interest who happens to be there while the hero is battling baddies. :(
« Last Edit: Jul 15, 2011, 3:39pm by DungeonDevil »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

YE AULD SKÜL
kesher
Level 10 Necromancer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Hobbyist of the Absurd & Recumbent Strategist


[homepage]

Joined: Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,330
Location: New Hope, MN
Karma: 93
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #18 on Jul 15, 2011, 3:37pm »


Quote:

* The production company earned my contempt when they announced that they would not be employing the fabulous imagery created by Frank Frazetta, with the excuse that they found his art to be too 'outdated' or somesuch limp language.


Okay, THAT one I agree with wholeheartedly! :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"He was one hundred seventy days dying and not yet dead."

SANDBOX EMPIRE

scribbledehobble
tombowings
Level 7 Enchanter
****
member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: Nov 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 517
Location: Corvallis, OR
Karma: 13
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #19 on Jul 25, 2011, 3:56pm »


Jul 15, 2011, 2:48pm, DungeonDevil wrote:
EDIT: Also, the fact they changed the title from A Princess of Mars to John Carter shows Disney's/Hollywood's misogyny. The emphasis is shifted away from the object of his love and the very reason for the protagonist's epic struggles to return to her and rescue her from peril. Really APoM is a romance novel written from the man's perspective. It's about what we are willing to endure, what we are ready to sacrifice for the most beautiful woman on the planet. Can't get more romantic than that. With the name-change the Princess just becomes the peripheral love-interest who happens to be there while the hero is battling baddies. :(


Wow, that really hits home for me. Well Put.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Check out Magician's Manse, my old school Dungeons and Dragons blog.
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,676
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #20 on Jul 25, 2011, 8:06pm »


Jul 15, 2011, 2:48pm, DungeonDevil wrote:
APoM is a romance novel written from the man's perspective.
Aw, and I liked the book until you said this. :P

Romance novel? We need to turn in our Man Cards. ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
badger2305
Level 7 Enchanter
****
member is offline




[homepage]

Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 669
Karma: 35
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #21 on Jul 26, 2011, 9:11am »


Jul 14, 2011, 6:12pm, tombowings wrote:
I've been a bit worried at the prospect of this film, but after seeing the trail I'm a little revealed. The Thark jarred by a little. But the visuals aren't too important to me. It's the spirit of the film that'll be the deciding factor for me.


Pretty much my thinking as well. One of the aspects of Peter Jackson's LOTR was that it did not match my own idea of how things should look, and for awhile I held that against the films. Then I realized that it was perfectly fine for Jackson to present his imagining of characters, place, and action - I could keep my own and that was okay. (Not sure if I'll ever stop shaking my head about the Bros. Hildebrandt versions - but that's for another post.)

I'm also reminded a little bit of the old debates about who was Doctor Who - was it Jon Pertwee or Tom Baker? People get used to the presentation they first encounter and later versions can seem jarring as a result.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

My gaming blog: The Sandbox of Doom
kesher
Level 10 Necromancer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Hobbyist of the Absurd & Recumbent Strategist


[homepage]

Joined: Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,330
Location: New Hope, MN
Karma: 93
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #22 on Jul 26, 2011, 12:32pm »


Quote:

I'm also reminded a little bit of the old debates about who was Doctor Who...


What debate? It was obviously Tom Baker. And his scarf. :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"He was one hundred seventy days dying and not yet dead."

SANDBOX EMPIRE

scribbledehobble
Finarvyn
Administrator
*****
Dungeon Master
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,676
Location: Near Chicago
Karma: 178
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #23 on Jul 26, 2011, 2:40pm »


Jul 26, 2011, 12:32pm, kesher wrote:

Quote:
I'm also reminded a little bit of the old debates about who was Doctor Who...
What debate? It was obviously Tom Baker. And his scarf. :)
Tom Baker all the way! I had no idea there was a debate on this. :D
« Last Edit: Dec 1, 2011, 11:18am by Finarvyn »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Marv / Finarvyn
DCC playtester (2011) C&C playtester (2003)
I'm partly responsible for the S&W WhiteBox
Builder of the TrollBridge
Master of Mutants; MA since 1976
OD&D Player since 1975

"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
terje
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline

[avatar]

Blasphemous accelerator



Joined: Jan 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 103
Location: Sweden, umeå
Karma: 6
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #24 on Nov 30, 2011, 1:51pm »

New trailer!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

My blog, Caverns Measureless to Man: http://measurelesscaverns.blog.com/
Cameron DuBeers
Level 9 Sorcerer
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Did I Make My Save?



Joined: Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,555
Location: Austin TX USA
Karma: 152
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #25 on Nov 30, 2011, 2:17pm »

Nice trailer! I remain rather optimistic about it, and I really dug that they used LZ's "Kashmir" for the soundtrack.

I wish I could have seen it without all the fawning and gushing over the actor but that is modern society for you. I've got no use for the Cult of Personalities that has arisen.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

warrioroffrobozz
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline

[avatar]

Feral Duck



Joined: Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 101
Location: Great Underground Empire
Karma: 2
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #26 on Nov 30, 2011, 4:54pm »


Jul 14, 2011, 2:48pm, Falconer wrote:
I **HATE** unfaithful adaptations (i.e. LotR), but I don’t see anything objectionable so far in this vague trailer. It looks good to me.

Unfortunately it's lucky for most movies to be even half as faithful as LotR.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Nestled before you is a peaceful Goblin Village, whose destiny is to be slaughtered by ruthless adventurers.
Attack?
rsdean
Level 2 Seer
*
member is offline





Joined: Aug 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 30
Karma: 3
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #27 on Nov 30, 2011, 6:05pm »

...and since LotR was faithful enoughmfor me either, I'm usually restricted to seeing movies that aren't adaptations. For this one, though, I'm trying to keep an open mind.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
crusssdaddy
Level 5 Thaumaturgist
***
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 329
Karma: 20
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #28 on Nov 30, 2011, 7:05pm »

I liked the first trailer a lot more.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

terje
Level 4 Theurgist
**
member is offline

[avatar]

Blasphemous accelerator



Joined: Jan 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 103
Location: Sweden, umeå
Karma: 6
 Re: John Carter!
« Reply #29 on Nov 30, 2011, 8:15pm »

I'm pretty sure the movie will end up quite far from the novel, but I try to think of it as "a sword n planet movie inspired by barsoom" rather than "A Princess of Mars faithfully brought to the screen". From that point of view it will probably be decently entertaining.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

My blog, Caverns Measureless to Man: http://measurelesscaverns.blog.com/
« Page 2 of 4 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile